I'm back!
For the past three decades, I have been struck by liberals' (often successful) attempts to paint all conservatives as stupid. While reading "Sarah Palin Said What?" at the Huffington Post, we come upon the same tired old schtick where numerous liberals rant about the stupidity of their latest target, rants that are often rife with grammatical and spelling errors and using the worst schoolyard language.
I still have people telling me how stupid Ronald Reagan was (and Dan Quayle, and George W, etc. etc.).
I can understand that human nature causes you to demonize those with whom you disagree, and I understand the urge to boost one's own self-esteem by considering oneself smarter, better informed, and morally superior to people who are vastly more successful than oneself. But it's really difficult to watch.
Give it a break already!
Here are some of the "Craziest Palinisms" according to HuffPo:
"As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where – where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border."
-- CBS interview with Katie Couric, September 25, 2008
What's wrong with that? Is this a remnant of the myth that the left won't let die where Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house, when that was actually Tina Fey doing a (very funny) caricature?
Here's another:
"So we discussed what was going on in Africa. And never, ever did I talk about, Well, gee, is it a country or is it a continent, I just don't know about this issue."
-- Fox interview with Greta Van Susteren, November 11, 2008
This is Sarah Palin discussing the myth (again perpetrated by the left) that she didn't know whether Africa was a country or a continent. Again, take someone that everybody knows (including yourself) and act as though your latest target didn't know it and viola! You're smarter than them. Please....
Another:
“Believe it or not – this was in the 60s – we used to hustle on over the border for health care that we would receive in Whitehorse…. Isn’t that kind of ironic now. Zooming over the border, getting health care from Canada.”
-- Speech in Calgary, Alberta, March 6, 2010
So it's ironic that 40 years ago Alaskans would go across the border for health care and now the Canadians do the opposite. Seems clear to me, but not if you've drank the HuffPo Kool-Aid!
"When the American people elected President Obama they gave him responsibility to handle this disaster. He promised to “heal the earth, and watch the waters recede...” or something far-fetched like that."
-- On the oil spill, May 27, 2010
Again, this seems like a very valid refudiation (ha!) of Obama's over-the-top campaign rhetoric, why is it even on this list? Oh, because anything said against Obama is crazy to the HuffPosters, unless you're attacking him for not being liberal enough (and believe it or not, they do).
“I didn’t believe the theory that human beings – thinking, loving beings – originated from fish that sprouted legs and crawled out of the sea. Or that human beings began as single-celled organisms that developed into monkeys who eventually swung down from the trees.”
--Going Rogue
Ok, I'll give them that one.
“With the gray Talkeetna Mountains in the distance and the first light covering of snow about to descend on Pioneer Peak, I breathed in an autumn bouquet that combined everything small-town America with rugged splashes of the Last Frontier.”
--Going Rogue
I guess romantic and poetic means crazy to them.
To be clear, I disagree with Ms. Palin on many things, but we can do that without attacking someone's intelligence, can't we? Honestly, other than the evolution blurb above, all of those 15 "crazy comments" according to the HuffPo were either a result of misspeaking on microphone or a difference of opinion. Please folks!
Dan Quayle uses an archaic spelling for potato and they paint him as a buffoon, but Obama claims there are 59 States and gets a pass. Actually, if most liberals had ever read anything written before 1880 or so, they would have seen potato spelled "potatoe". How much do you want to bet that Dan Quayle has read more classics than your average HuffPoster?
Their genius-in-chief is lost without a teleprompter, but Palin's an intellectual lightweight because she cribs a few notes on her palm.
They're ridiculous and don't even realize it.
Mojo
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
My Prediction!
I've been out of touch for awhile, so I thought I'd jump back in the game with a bold prediction for a McCain/Palin victory!
In spite of how the MSM will paint it, it won't be due to the Bradley Effect, it will be due to the Spiral of Silence.
It might just be wishful thinking.....
We'll know tomorrow!
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Genius?
I'm sure that this result was only because I link to people like Victor Hanson and Mark Steyn, but I'd like to think it picked up my quote:
"Jeremy Clarkson is a pompous jerk"
"Jeremy Clarkson is a pompous jerk"
Cash Advance Loans
Bias? What Bias?
I was looking at CNN this morning and I saw this article from WSDU-TV in New Orleans:
HOUMA, La. -- A state representative in a runoff election infuriated civil rights leaders after she ended a conversation with the mother of the NAACP's local president by saying, "Talk to you later, Buckwheat."
State Rep. Carla Blanchard Dartez, of Morgan City, acknowledged she made the remark during a Thursday night telephone conversation with Hazel Boykin to thank her for driving voters to the polls.
Buckwheat, a black child character in the "Little Rascals" comedies of the 1930s and '40s, is viewed as a racial stereotype demeaning to black people.
Hmmm..... I'm trying to tell if good ole Carla is a Republican or Democrat. Since they aren't saying, I'll assume she's the latter. Ah wait! A clue! When we get to the bottom of the article we see this:
But the "Buckwheat" remark is the latest bit of trouble for Dartez and her husband, Lenny, who is a member of the Democratic Party's State Central Committee.
Aha! We now know that that her husband is a member of the State Democratic Party Committee, but what about Carla? Are we to assume that she's a Democrat too? It could be one of those "mixed-marriages" that I've heard about.
Since it never says, we'll have to draw our own conclusions. I'll assume that she's a Democrat because if she were a Republican they would have stated that fact in the first sentence of the article and then repeatedly throughout.
This is exactly the kind of subtle bias prevalent in the MSM.
I read that 92% of Washington D.C. journalists voted for John Kerry and I wasn't the least bit surprised.
HOUMA, La. -- A state representative in a runoff election infuriated civil rights leaders after she ended a conversation with the mother of the NAACP's local president by saying, "Talk to you later, Buckwheat."
State Rep. Carla Blanchard Dartez, of Morgan City, acknowledged she made the remark during a Thursday night telephone conversation with Hazel Boykin to thank her for driving voters to the polls.
Buckwheat, a black child character in the "Little Rascals" comedies of the 1930s and '40s, is viewed as a racial stereotype demeaning to black people.
Hmmm..... I'm trying to tell if good ole Carla is a Republican or Democrat. Since they aren't saying, I'll assume she's the latter. Ah wait! A clue! When we get to the bottom of the article we see this:
But the "Buckwheat" remark is the latest bit of trouble for Dartez and her husband, Lenny, who is a member of the Democratic Party's State Central Committee.
Aha! We now know that that her husband is a member of the State Democratic Party Committee, but what about Carla? Are we to assume that she's a Democrat too? It could be one of those "mixed-marriages" that I've heard about.
Since it never says, we'll have to draw our own conclusions. I'll assume that she's a Democrat because if she were a Republican they would have stated that fact in the first sentence of the article and then repeatedly throughout.
This is exactly the kind of subtle bias prevalent in the MSM.
I read that 92% of Washington D.C. journalists voted for John Kerry and I wasn't the least bit surprised.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
SCHIPS
Just a question,
Why can't the democrats trot out someone who is not actually eligible for public health assistance but deserve it? As opposed to already eligible, like the Frosts and the Wilkersons.
Is it because they can't find anyone that fits that category? I mean, if I wanted to expand an entitlement program, I would find someone that would be helped by that expansion!
Plenty on this issue over at Michelle Malkin's site.
Why can't the democrats trot out someone who is not actually eligible for public health assistance but deserve it? As opposed to already eligible, like the Frosts and the Wilkersons.
Is it because they can't find anyone that fits that category? I mean, if I wanted to expand an entitlement program, I would find someone that would be helped by that expansion!
Plenty on this issue over at Michelle Malkin's site.
The Nobel Prize for Science Fiction
I didn't even know it existed until now.
The Goracle has finally joined the ranks of the righteous, alongside:
1. Mangari Maathai (2004), who at a press conference announcing her award told reporters she believes AIDS is the product of a bio-engineering released as a weapon of mass destruction by Western scientists to punish blacks."
2. Shirin Ebadi (2003), who defends Irans nuclear program as economically justified."
3. Jimmy "The Dhimmi" Carter (2002), an anti-Semite and co-creator of the modern Islamic Republic of Iran.
4. EX UN GenSec Kofi Annan (2001), who oversaw the UN Oil-for-Food scam keeping Saddam Hussein in power, enriching dozens of UN officials, journalists and politicians around the world, and contributing to the Iraq war.
5. Yasser Arafat (1994) bus bomber, terrorist, anti-Semite, possibly poisoned by other PLO leaders because he stood in the way of lucrative deals with Israel.
6. Mohammed Al-Baradi, head of the IAEA under who's watch Iran, North Korea, Syria et. al.? have proliferated weapons and/or pursued their nuclear dreams.
I have to go be sick now.......
The Goracle has finally joined the ranks of the righteous, alongside:
1. Mangari Maathai (2004), who at a press conference announcing her award told reporters she believes AIDS is the product of a bio-engineering released as a weapon of mass destruction by Western scientists to punish blacks."
2. Shirin Ebadi (2003), who defends Irans nuclear program as economically justified."
3. Jimmy "The Dhimmi" Carter (2002), an anti-Semite and co-creator of the modern Islamic Republic of Iran.
4. EX UN GenSec Kofi Annan (2001), who oversaw the UN Oil-for-Food scam keeping Saddam Hussein in power, enriching dozens of UN officials, journalists and politicians around the world, and contributing to the Iraq war.
5. Yasser Arafat (1994) bus bomber, terrorist, anti-Semite, possibly poisoned by other PLO leaders because he stood in the way of lucrative deals with Israel.
6. Mohammed Al-Baradi, head of the IAEA under who's watch Iran, North Korea, Syria et. al.? have proliferated weapons and/or pursued their nuclear dreams.
I have to go be sick now.......
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Why They Hate the Neocons
Roger L. Simon has a post up at Pajamas Media about Neocons. Those of us who have been derisively lumped together with that moniker (justified or not) might find this interesting:
Why They Hate the Neocons
Why They Hate the Neocons
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)